Talk:Sri Ram Sena

Skip to table of contents

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Sri Ram Sena article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

The subject of this article is controversial and content may be in dispute. When updating the article, be bold, but not reckless. Feel free to try to improve the article, but don't take it personally if your changes are reversed; instead, come here to the talk page to discuss them. Content must be written from a neutral point of view. Include citations when adding content and consider tagging or removing unsourced information.

Please stay calm and civil while commenting or presenting evidence, and do not make personal attacks. Be patient when approaching solutions to any issues. If consensus is not reached, other solutions exist to draw attention and ensure that more editors mediate or comment on the dispute.

This article is written in Indian English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, travelled, centre, analysed, defence) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.

India: Karnataka / Politics Low‑importance

	India portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Karnataka (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by the Indian politics workgroup (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article was last assessed in May 2012.

Hinduism Low‑importance

	Hinduism portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Hinduism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Hinduism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.HinduismWikipedia:WikiProject HinduismTemplate:WikiProject HinduismHinduism articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Discrimination Top‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Discrimination, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Discrimination on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.DiscriminationWikipedia:WikiProject DiscriminationTemplate:WikiProject DiscriminationDiscrimination articles
Top	This article has been rated as Top-importance on the importance scale.

Crime and Criminal Biography: Terrorism High‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Crime and Criminal Biography, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Crime and Criminal Biography articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Crime and Criminal BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject Crime and Criminal BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Crime and Criminal BiographyCrime-related articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Terrorism task force (assessed as High-importance).

Organizations Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Organizations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Organizations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OrganizationsWikipedia:WikiProject OrganizationsTemplate:WikiProject Organizationsorganization articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Notice

I have opened this issue at the Administrators' noticeboard for Incidents. I will not be here next week and I cant observe, so I hope everything works out. Here is a link to the posting.[1] Sephiroth storm (talk) 05:47, 22 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

appeals

Someone keeps adding "(though sena members had beaten boys but letting girls out of their way)" into the Mangalore Pub Attacks section, with a citation that goes to an article saying the exact opposite. Reputable news sources including NDTV have show footage of activists attacking women, and their leadership has admitted as much, on the site they link to. Their vandalisation of wiki for the purposes of self-promotion should give it a flag. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Harryfmk (talk • contribs) 09:40, 26 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

PLeased wiki this rama sena group has all communally dangerous people we request u to remove all the details about this group.. i wish indian govt will ban this organisation and should be treated as terrorist organisation........

This article is created in the name of Sri Ram Sena and the whole article is to insult Sri Ram Sena which is not fair. So i kindly request to remove this article. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Sathishmls (talk • contribs) 09:45, 13 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Specify your exact, specific reasons here, not in the article - Skysmith (talk) 09:59, 13 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

People will only see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sri_Ram_Sena and they will get a negative picture of Sri Ram Sena. This is vandalism. This is not fair. This is Atrocious.

Remove all the unfair things from the main page !!! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Sathishmls (talk • contribs) 10:28, 13 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia policy is to report what happens, not to advocate either side. However, your actions constitute political or religious advocacy, which is against Wikipedia policies. - Skysmith (talk) 10:34, 13 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Ok.Fine. I will be true that i add only what happens. Also i will make sure that the false information given by some media should not pollute wikipedia.

Skysmith, you are reverting my changes and you are unknowningly adding false information to wikipedia.

I will be continuosly reverting if you change again, because you are violating the philosophy of wikipedia which is always the truth. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Sathishmls (talk • contribs) 07:07, 17 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The philosophy of Wikipedia is verifiability. That key policy starts with the words "The threshold for inclusion in Wikipedia is verifiability, not truth." JohnCD (talk) 08:44, 17 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

just a point here i thought they were called shri ram sene? just a clarification needed here thank you —Preceding unsigned comment added by Tca achintya (talk • contribs) 13:19, 7 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

abduction

there is consensus among sources that sri ram sena is suspected in this case. so this article on sri ram sena should include this information. it's not for us to decide who's responsible, we just reflect the sources.

i'm adding additional sources. also adding muthalik's denial, to balance out.

cheers

--vvarkey (talk) 17:53, 7 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Group

References to the Ramayana do not belong in this article, since this is a political group (outfit? gang?) with tenuous ties to Hinduism the religion (if at all). Also the name should be Sene, since there is what appears to be a need for disambiguation. I also want to know why all this biased material in favor of the organization keeps appearing on the page.Pectore^talk 19:47, 15 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Sources

Where are the sources on this "Kalki Ji" Maharaj, the Sri Ram Sene being the literal army of the Ramayana, or any of the praise section. In terms of the groups welcome in the media, its only known for its pub and valentines day controversies.Pectore^talk 22:41, 22 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

2009 Mangalore pub attacks

Why is there no mention of the Mangalore pub attacks on this page? Here is a source proving Sri Ram Sena was behind it: http://articles.latimes.com/2009/jan/29/world/fg-india-brawl29 Cheers, Lostromantic (talk) 11:44, 22 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Have no idea how that was overlooked all this while (or was it removed?) , I've added a sub-section for it from the main article itself 2009 Mangalore pub attack. -Ugog Nizdast (talk) 18:14, 22 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 2 external links on Sri Ram Sena. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 22:00, 26 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Original research

I have reverted @Vanamonde93:'s edits, because it restored original research regarding the vandalism of an exhibition of M F Hussain's paintings and they didn't attacked only "attacked women for going to a pub", but both young men and women, it was not mentioned clearly. Capitals00 (talk) 08:17, 23 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The removal of OR is fine; but the sections you have created make absolutely no sense. We have an "Activities and accusations" section, which starts off with some activities, and then a sub-section saying "other" with other activities and some accusations. I'd rather not revert you yet again, so please fix this. Vanamonde (talk) 09:43, 23 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Ordered them by dates now. Capitals00 (talk) 09:58, 23 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]